Representation c. 800: Arab, Byzantine, Carolingian

Representation c. 800: Arab, Byzantine, Carolingian

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Representation c. 800: Arab, Byzantine, Carolingian

By Leslie Brubaker

Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (Sixth Series), No.19 (2009)

Abstract: What could or should be visually represented was a contested issue across the medieval Christian and Islamic world around the year 800. This article examines how Islamic, Byzantine, Carolingian and Palestinian Christian attitudes toward representation were expressed, and differed, across the seventh and eighth centuries. Islamic prohibitions against representing human figures were not universally recognised, but were particularly – if sometimes erratically – focused on mosque decoration. Byzantine ‘iconoclasm’ – more properly called iconomachy – was far less destructive than its later offshoots in France and England, and resulted in a highly nuanced re-definition ofwhat representation meant in the Orthodox church. Carolingian attitudes toward images were on the whole far less passionate than either Islamic or Orthodox views, but certain members of the elite had strong views, which resulted in particular visual expressions. Palestinian Christians, living under Islamic rule, modulated their attitudes toward images to conform with local social beliefs. Particularly in areas under Orthodox or Islamic control, then, representation mattered greatly around the year 800, and this article examines how and why this impacted on local production.

Watch the video: The study of Byzantine skeletons, with Chryssa Bourbou (July 2022).


  1. Sat

    No, I won't be able to tell you.

  2. Nilmaran

    I think, that you are mistaken. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will communicate.

  3. Manning

    You responded quickly ...

  4. Tonos

    Quite right! I think it is a good idea.

  5. Fugeltun

    It doesn't quite come close to me. Can the variants still exist?

  6. Rainer

    I know the site with the answer to your question.

  7. Ansell

    Sorry to interfere, but I need a little more information.

Write a message